PACMA opposes the skin of the lobjo and ask the Ombudsman to act for the constitutional and Defend those who only try to solve the problems of coexistence with the species by sticking random shots.
Thanks to the lack of protection to which it is exposed from Europe and from various Spanish autonomous communities, the hunt of the wolf. Take advantage of a legislative list, the level of protection of the wolf has been reduced, so that it is removed from the list of species in a special protection regime. As a result, it can be hunted again as a trophy, in addition to the various autonomous administrations that call it ‘extraction’ barbarism.
Rather Betting on coexistence, promoting measures for vein protection (mastiffs, fences, supporting shepherds, etc.) And guaranteeing rapid and honest payments of the damage, it is again gambling on managing the conflict in Schoten. At a time when the populations of the species have not been restored, nor has a real coexistence been achieved.
Exclusion of the Wolf van Lespre
Through a written statement, the PACMA -Dyard party has asked the Ombudsman who resorts to the Exclusion of the wolf from the list of species in the special protection regime (Lestre) for the Constitutional Court, since the approval of this measure by the congress “is contrary to constitutional regulations”.
One of the reasons for unconstitution, political education claims an invasion of competencies, «The congress lacks some competence, faculty or attributing to exclude the Lobo Lobo«, As reported in a statement released by PACMA, his legal adviser, Eva Ramos.
Instead, Ramos claims that «The recording, modification or exclusion of a species is the competence of the Ministry of Ecological TransitionAs explicitly established by the Natural Heritage and Biodiversity Act ».
Another basis for unconstitution is “ Lack of public participation in taking this decision “because” the constitution states that we all have the right to enjoy an adequate environmentBut also the duty to keep it, “according to the statement.
In this regard, they point to law 27/2006 of 18 July, which states that “we must all be able to participate in the approval of the measures approved with regard to the environment” and Article 9 of the Constitution that states that “this participation is usually done by accusations, In what we know as a public hearing process, to which the exclusion of the wolf has not been submitted. “
In addition, PACMA has pointed out to the representatives of random action, with an unprotected species without taking into account Consult the specialized and created bodies: autonomous communities, representative entities of the affected sectors and without public participation. ”
The national president of Pacma, Javier Luna, has made it clear that the petition to the Ombudsman must be «Protect our natural heritage and the associated appeal is collected for the constitutional court«.
The training has labeled it “illegal, unfair and deeply regressive for the preservation of the species »the exclusion of it from Lesprere And he called for a demonstration against the congress under the motto next Wednesday 14 MaySave the Iberian Wolf“. EFE / ECOTICIA.COM