A major discovery was the optimal use of hydrogen as an energy source for countless machines, thanks to its great optimization and easy access. Nevertheless, its arrival has created a major problem, namely its expensive preservation and transport. Now, however, a revolutionary idea has arrived to dethrone green hydrogen.
Advantages and disadvantages that are not known about green hydrogen
- Advantages: It is a material without CO2 emissionssignificantly through the use of fossil fuels, acting as an efficient means to obtain more types of renewable energy, such as wind or solar energy. Moreover, this is a major step at a scientific level that has encouraged innovation and constant search for optimizing their production.
- Disadvantages: One of the biggest problems with using hydrogen is its complex cost an extremely expensive product to implement in some companiesThis would lead to another point against it, namely its storage and transportation, as it is a highly flammable material and therefore must have good protection. Finally, we face low efficiency when it comes to production because large amounts of renewable energy are spent on its production.
A new type (H2) that promises high effectiveness on the market
This new product promises to be just as effective as green H2. Remember that the latter is largely produced by wind and solar, which keeps production easy and has a great economic impact. On the contrary, the pink hydrogen It is produced in a much more sustainable way and has a significant advantage over green, which now has a long list of disadvantages that prevent its free use.
The new and innovative, pink H2, promises an extensive list of great benefits, starting with the low production of a gas that makes the famous green gassignificantly increasing the hope of making a leap into the world of energy saving through a promising energy transition that could change the climate impact that large companies cause annually with their high emissions.


Well, a recent study conducted in the United States assumes that if pink and green hydrogen were subsidized by the state, the price of both would be less than two dollars per kilogram in a hypothetical case. On the other hand, the different production techniques would bring a significant change between both products, with the pink H2 being the most economically attractive.
What are the differences between these two types of hydrogen?
Considering the cases mentioned above, the pink H2, produced under the famous electrolysis technique, would be positioned at an amount of $ 0.48. On the other hand, green fuel would cost approximately $0.82 due to the costs incurred from renewable sources. The figures are very clear, due to the production method there is a significant economic advantage to be gained from one of these products.
In the event that pink H2 prevails over green H2 due to its favorable and attractive economic costs for many consumers, orders for green hydrogen to power heavy machinery and large corporations would be halted en masse. However, that would not be the worst thing, but it would actually slow down investments in sustainable energy funds.
Due to the mentioned delicate situation, it is of the utmost importance that a competitive market between both products is currently established, in order to prevent a decrease in the use of these very environmentally friendly and, above all, sustainable energy sources. Which do you prefer?